Reviews for Charles R. Hulten
Average Rating:| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: April 9, 2012, 11:17 am | He lecture is boring, but he is knowledgable. He doesn't take attendance. There are 6 homework, two midterm, and a final. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: A May 20, 2011, 7:58 am | While Hulten's teaching style is not super helpful, the class is not too bad. ECON 306 is definitely a class where teaching yourself will really help. If econ comes somewhat naturally to you, to do well in the class all you have to do is memorize/understand his PPT slides and then look up anything you don't understand in the book. If econ does not come naturally to you, read the chapters and look through the PPTs. For tests, Hulten gives the best advice: look at each slide and think about the purpose of the slide and the questions that he could ask you about it. Though the most important thing for this class is making sure you UNDERSTAND the material and it MAKES SENSE to you. If you just memorize it with no rationalization, the tests will be harder than they need to be. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: A May 16, 2011, 11:10 am | Definitely not great. He is very dry, and while he definitely knows his subject, he is not great at keeping class interesting and lecture attendance drops to 15% by week 7. He tells you the first day that you don't have to come. The material isn't that much different than ECON200 and while they show you some calculus, you don't need it. 6 online quizzes, lowest gets dropped. they start out easy and get pretty tough at the end. He provides problem sets before the quizzes which are very similar, so make sure you pay attention to those. 2 midterms and a final. They are very similar to old exams and problem sets, so not that tough. Scales the class against your peers, so if you beat the curve, you'll be fine. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: A- May 11, 2011, 7:54 am | I understand that ECON is a tough class to teach and that students will never be very interested in it, but you have to do SOMETHING to try to get them involved. He drones on monotonously for an hour and 15 minutes to the point where you can't listen to him. My suggestion is to learn from the textbook and use the quizzes to practice. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: B May 9, 2011, 7:59 am | If I somehow was not accepted into the Smith School, my last choice would have been majoring in Economics, and this class solidified this. I have never experienced such an inefficient, ineffective, and generally incompetent teaching style as ECON306 with Professor Hulten. To myself and most students I have spoken to, I have gathered that he is highly disliked for several reasons: First, his lectures are incredibly boring. Over the course of the semester, you would have thought the class came down with a case of SARS, only to miraculously return to the class when an exam was scheduled. Second, the TA’s were very ineffective when he was out with a sickness. When several students asked for practice problems, the answer was simply, “We don’t have enough time.” Are you kidding me? What kind of teacher/TA deliberately doesn’t want their students to learn the material by practicing? None of the lectures included problems that we would see during exams, which made studying very difficult. This leads me to my third reason; the slides presented in class were very different from the ones put on ELMS. On many occasions, slides were missing or completely different from the ones online. This made it extremely difficult to study for quizzes and tests, since the material simply wasn’t there. When quiz answers were posted, they were simply answers. No work was shown, god forbid you get a question wrong and not know how to figure it out when it comes time for a test. I understand that economics is a part of business...if a professor who actually could relay the information to the students in the class taught it. Professor Charles Hulten, in my opinion, has been the worst teacher in my 4 semesters here at the University of Maryland. Not just because he teaches a class that is incredibly boring and monotonous, but his overall demeanor during class. His voice was only audible if you sat within 11 inches from him or had incredible, supernatural hearing, and even then you could not hear his mumbling even with the aid of a microphone. Yes, I understand that he was out for a good month due to illness, but before his illness and after his illness, it seemed as though he was only teaching for the sake of teaching. Obviously, he has a great understanding of the subject, otherwise he wouldn't be teaching here. However, on one occasion, I emailed him twice and received no response. The matter at hand was a question on a problem set that is ungraded. After not returning my emails, I went to his office hours and explained the problem and asked for some help on the solution and to get a better understanding of the material. His response was simply, "Go ask the TAs." What type of “distinguished” professor denies a student the right to come to office hours to receive assistance and just turns him/her away without a valid reason? This is simply absurd. I have attended every single class and have learned absolutely nothing. Many students I have talked to in the class feel the same way and this is terrible. As a student, I feel as though you should learn at least ONE piece of information that you can use in the future, and this class nullified that theory with ease. To be honest, it really pisses me off that the University of Maryland would continue to employ such incompetent people to teach such an important course. Failure to give practice problems (seriously, how hard is it to put together 10-12 problems for each chapter) and blaming it on “not enough time” was the worst excuse I’ve ever heard in my entire life. How can you try to teach a class if there are no examples to base studying off of? If you don’t want to give practice to your students, then go teach at a community college where students don’t care at all, because here I know for a fact students want the best education and actually learn topics discussed in class. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: April 2, 2010, 8:55 am | The business school keeps getting better and better! First Karen Gold, now this. He won't answer questions, responding that "the TAs will go over it in discussion." TAs don't give a crap and hurry through discussion trying to avoid answering questions, cus, you know, they have more important things to do. Waste of money and time. Don't go to class and teach yourself, you'll do better than if you go to class. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON306 Grade Expected: A- May 7, 2009, 1:21 am | Worst teacher and TAs Ive ever had. Hulten could give a crap about any of his students. None of the students seemed to understand anything he was saying and everyone just stopped showing up. It took him and his TAs weeks to post the answer keys to the tests and the grades. Overall, dont expect to learn anything in his class. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON326 Grade Expected: A April 15, 2008, 2:56 pm | The combination of his confusing and oversimplistic, stained overheads dated back to 1992 and his incoherent ramblings to go along with it make this class hard to stand, but you'll have to just suck it up because you're an econ major and he is teaching a class that is a prereq for 400 levels. Luckily, as others have said, tests aren't bad as long as you read the book, and homeworks are his old ECON306 homeworks for non-majors. |
| I'll rate u Course: ECON326 Grade Expected: A April 2, 2008, 9:39 am | study at home and get an A. go to his classes and get an F or lower I am not gonna add anything, the guys said what i see as 100% true. |
| Miss. Ma Course: ECON326 Grade Expected: March 27, 2008, 6:05 pm | It was sad to say that I was very dissapointed to have him again. I had him for econ300 (when he makeshiftly taught the first half), and now for 326. His voice is so diffucult to hear. Its like a lulliby, putting me to sleep in class. His ancient slides, no I mean, his outdated and stained to prove it overhead transparencies and his presentations of them were a disorganized blaaa. You walk in with nothing and walk out just the same. The only up side is that his TAs are there to help, and the real lecturing is done in discussion. His exams are simple, and his homeworks are do-able. Also, over the two consecutive semesters that I have had him, he has made attempts to connect with us through youthful examples. For one, he used a bug named Sqishie to convey utility maximization, and uses examples of Ipods and sitting in class for other concepts. BUT, they are all hits and misses. Poor fellow. He is a genious, but just cannot translate it into a lecuturer. |
| Anonymous Course: ECON326 Grade Expected: December 7, 2007, 7:58 am | He has the knowledge to teach, but he has problems delivering it to the students. His class is boring and what kills me is his jokes that no one laughs at unless himself. I am taking this class with him cuz I have to take it and his sections are the only sections that fit into my schedual. AVOID HIM. |
| tadpole Course: ECON300 Grade Expected: October 29, 2007, 10:07 pm | Very dry, monotonous and boring. Extremely technical in his explanations and terms. Obviously knows the subject material very well but doesn't convey it in a way that makes sense at all to the class. |
| jge1023 Course: ECON300 Grade Expected: October 23, 2007, 1:16 pm | I don't understand anything he is ever talking about. Neither does the rest of my class. Extremely boring, has a monotonous voice, explains things in very technical terms. Probably a really good economist, but not a very good teacher. He doesn't make our exams though so there not too bad. |