Reviews for June E. Hargrove
Average Rating:| Anonymous Course: ARTH346 Grade Expected: A April 19, 2012, 11:37 am | Dr. Hargrove is divine (almost as divine as the pieces we studied). She's a gifted and knowledgable lecturer as well as a genuinely wonderful person. She wants her students to succeed and always makes herself available to those who are hoping to improve. The class itself requires a moderate amount of work: attending lecture regularly, reviewing the textbook before exams, etc. There is a research paper due at the end of the semester that counts for 25% of your final grade, so take it seriously. |
| Anonymous Course: ARTH201 Grade Expected: A December 26, 2011, 2:13 pm | If you like art &/or history this is the class for you. As a CORE, it is a reasonable amount of work, while maintaining its integrity as a very interesting and engaging class. Keep in mind there is a lot of memorization- if you aren't interested in art, this part can get old very fast. Hargrove is great though- and TA's are, for the most part, great. ps-DO NOT let your phone ring/ open cans of soda/ open the door at the front of the hall during lecture. Lecturer will not be happy. |
| kvizzle321 Course: ARTH201 Grade Expected: B December 20, 2008, 12:29 am | Lectures are extremely boring. Gives a guideline of the painters and terms that you need to know. TA (Suzy) was great. Go to discussion for the valuable stuff. Grade comes down to 2 tests, a few quizzes, participation in discussion, and one paper where you have to go to the National Gallery. If you study well for the tests and cram in memorizing the paintings you will do well. The book is helpful but Hargrove is a very dry, annoyng lecturer. Very nice lady though. I rarely went to lectures and will get atleast a B (an A if i do well on the final) |